News24.com | The plot thickens: Photos of Van Gogh stolen from Dutch museum now ‘circulating in mafia circles’

managed wordpress hosting

Van Gogh's

Van Gogh’s “The Parsonage Garden at Nuenen in Spring 1884”

  • A Dutch art detective says he has “proof of life” photos of a Van Gogh painting stolen from a museum in Amsterdam.
  • The painting was stolen back in March, and is valued at about six million euros.
  • The photos are said to now be circulating in mafia circles.

A Dutch art detective revealed Thursday he has received two “proof of life” photographs of a Vincent Van Gogh painting stolen from a museum during the coronavirus lockdown.

Burglars snatched the 1884 painting “Parsonage Garden at Nuenen in Spring”, which is valued at up to six million euros, from the Singer Laren Museum near Amsterdam on 30 March.

Arthur Brand, dubbed the “Indiana Jones of the Art World” for tracing a series of high-profile lost artworks, said he was handed the photos a few days ago by a source he declined to identify.

The photographs, of which AFP was given two copies, show the painting, together with a front page of the New York Times newspaper of May 30 to prove when the photos were taken.

Mafia circles

“After three months of intensive investigation, I was handed these pictures. This is the first ‘proof of life’ we have that the painting still exists,” Brand said.

He added that the photos were “circulating in mafia circles”.

Sledgehammer used in theft of Vincent van Gogh painting from Dutch museum March 30, security video shows. Man broke through museum’s reinforced glass doors and left with ‘The Parsonage Garden at Nuenen in Spring 1884’ tucked under his arm. Previous story: https://t.co/inaRrA0w4c pic.twitter.com/VYX6VNb5Wq

— CBC News Alerts (@CBCAlerts) April 22, 2020

In the photographs, a new scratch can be seen on the bottom of the painting, which Brand said he believed must have happened during the robbery.

Asked about the authenticity of the painting shown in the photos, Brand said one of them shows the back of the artwork featuring the so-called provenance – the history of ownership – which serves almost as a type of fingerprint for the artwork.

“There is no doubt in my mind that this is the genuine article,” he said.

Brand, who declined to divulge how he obtained the photos, said he believed there could be a number of reasons the art thieves decided to circulate them.

“It could simply be that they are trying to find a buyer in the criminal underworld,” he added.

Asked if he had passed on the information to the Dutch police, Brand said “he was following the usual channels”.

About Author

Vijayry

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *